Evaluating Strip and No-Till Maintenance of Perennial Groundcovers for Annual Grain Production

نویسندگان

چکیده

Perennial groundcover (PGC) merges scalable soil and water conservation with high-yielding row crops, enhancing ecosystem services of annual grain crop production. However, ineffective suppression increases competition between the crop, reducing yield. The objective this study was to assess effectiveness three Kentucky bluegrass (KBG) methods each at narrow wide widths on maize (Zea mays L.) growth development in evenly spaced PGC, compared alternating PGC swards a no-PGC conventional tillage control. Suppression for included two different strip implements, completing either shallow or deep fracture, mechanical banded sprayer no-tillage chemical suppression. We measured weekly plant height, phenological stage development, reflected red:far-red (R:FR) ratio, early vegetative final density, stover yield, yield components kernel rows ear−1, kernels row−1, ear length, weight, grass frequency, weed community. In 2020, (11.38 Mg ha−1) similar control (12.78 greater than (9.62 ha−1). Maize systems 2021 (7.41 ha−1), due drought high coefficient variation. Weed community both years. A response observed across methods. Groundcover dormancy may be needed conjunction effective and/or support production PGC.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Optimizing Strip-Till and No-Till Systems for Corn

Recent developments in biofuel demand and the rapid adoption of modern transgenic hybrids are changing production systems towards more corn after corn, more intensive tillage, higher plant populations, and ever higher crop residue levels at harvest. Meeting society’s needs for food, feed, and fuel from grain corn, and in the future from corn stover, requires continued refinement of tillage syst...

متن کامل

No-till Grain Production in Wyoming: Status and Potential

In dryland cropping systems, optimal yields require that nutrient supply matches the soil’s yield potential supported by available moisture. Conservation tillage systems that leave at least 30 percent of the soil surface covered by residue dramatically increase moisture retained in the soil compared to crop-fallow systems. This enables producers to plant two, three, or four consecutive crops, o...

متن کامل

Between-Row Mowing Systems Control Summer Annual Weeds in No-Till Grain Sorghum

In previous research, use of PRE soil residual herbicides was reduced 50% in no-till corn and soybean by banding herbicides over crop rows followed by mowing weeds growing between rows two times. The research goals were (1) to determine whether such between-row mowing systems adequately controlled weeds and prevented grain yield loss in other competitive field crops, such as no-till grain sorgh...

متن کامل

No-till Wheat Production in Oklahoma

Should I switch from conventional till to no-till wheat production? This is one of the most common questions asked by Oklahoma farmers, but it is also one of the most difficult to answer. There are several considerations when making this decision, and there is certainly no one-size-fits-all program for converting from conventional till to no-till wheat production. A few factors to be considered...

متن کامل

Study of Grain Yield and Agro-Physiological Characteristics of Some Promising Rainfed Bread Wheat Genotypes under No-Till Condition

   In order to evaluate the productivity potential of some bread wheat varieties and promising lines under no-till rainfed condition two different on-farm trials were conducted in cold (Sonqor) and warm (Sarpol-e Zahab) regions of Kermanshah province during 2017-18 cropping season. In the cold condition, 12 winter genotypes and in the warm condition 32 spring genotypes were evaluated for grain ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Crops

سال: 2022

ISSN: ['2673-7655']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/crops2030020